Court of Appeal game-changer for validity and continuous residence.
The recent case law of R (Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 1909 which finds: that whilst “book-ended” overstaying does not break continuous residence, neither can that period be counted towards the five or ten year qualifying period; that paragraph 39E applies not just to application refusals but also notices of invalidity, regardless of whether section 3C leave is in play; Confirms that in most cases, invalidity (and by extension validity) occurs automatically by operation of law, regardless of whether the Home Office issues a notice of invalidity and it also extends the Mirza exception to retrospective invalidity beyond biometrics.
Latest Posts
Huge increase to immigration fees announced
On the 13th of July 2023, the UK Government announced that the Immigration (IHS) will increase from £624 to £1035 per person per year for most main...
Huge increase to immigration fees announced
“Court cast doubt on British citizenship of EU citizens”
In the recent case of R (on the Application of Roehrig) v Secretary of State for Home Department (2023) WLR (D)38. The High court has cast doubt on the...
Fee waiver introduced for children applying for British citizenship
The Home Office has introduced a fee exemption and fee waiver for children under 18 who are eligible to register for British citizenship. Currently,...